Talk:Armor class: Archer/@comment-198.22.136.2-20170127162927/@comment-2003:DB:F3D6:1B95:D12F:FBEC:EF87:114-20190729150046

"Because it led to more confusion than it actually helped to include the +0 in the respective unit pages." - nonsense. Put it there to have clarity. Chu-Ko-Nu's page also mentiones their "+0 melee" damage. Sure, against rams (-3 armor) that comes in handy, and right now, for that "+0" anti archer damage, I cannot think of a single unit this would actually make a difference towards... but still. Make a little footnote, that explains it and you are done! You actually create more confusion this way (the way you did it now) than you would in reverse.

"Also, the +0 is not supposed to be an attack bonus against the Elephant Archer, but needs to be there so the Persian team bonus can work." - but boyars and gbetos carry it, too, afaik; so that's an inconsistent argument at best. To be frank: it makes no sense to begin with, as other team-bonus induced bonus-damages work fine w/o such "+0" to build on to.