Talk:Civilizations (Age of Empires II)/@comment-88.147.1.163-20190623200307/@comment-2A0A:A541:472B:0:EDFE:BA5D:2125:8308-20190707143155

Lombards for West/South European; would be nice idea, but Normans would be better. Normas are really important to early European time and are really missing.

'Central Europa' - well it seems to be more Northern Europe to me. Swiss is a nice nation but AoE does not use nations; they use peoples - and that would not work with them well. Same for Bohemian as parts of Slavic. But you could also add some more former germanic tribes that became major peoples like saxones. I would like to see the fiino-ugric people here. Removing the Huns is a good idea anyways.

East Europe: Is good that way. I could also think of Byzantine here but there is no real need to. Polish - yea they are missing but there gameplay would be very similar to maygars so no really need.

South Europe (Mediterran) - Well also add the Spanish maybe; it's strage they are West European but Portuguese aren't.

Far East - keep it the way it is. No changes with viatnam - they are good there.

Indochinese (South East Asia). It's fine.

India: Hard to finde something that is not part of India... Maybe Lanka?

Mesoamerican: I think 4 civs for each building stlye is perfect so one more would be nice. But the Incas are no real mesoamerican (just Mexico and Central America; no Southern America). Zapotec could be nice adding. If the devs want to make more DLC in future they could think about using the Northern and Southern Parts of America aswell - but here its hard no to go to far (colonial age would be to late). Mapuche are a nice nativ American folk but were they also iportant in post colubian area?

African: Yea Swahili would be nice. Hausa or Nubia would be nice too.

Central Asia: Well seems to be fine.

If the devs would like to make more civ; I could also think about african southern Sahara - Simbabwe, Congo for example.

But honestly: I think we have almost enogth folks so far. I think there is no need of a lot more.