User blog:Wildoneshelper/My proposed category tree

This is my proposed category tree. Please comment on it.



Reasons why infantry, cavalry, artillery should be included in articles are siege units could be either an infantry and artillery. If we don't mention which type they belong to, players will don't know which kind of unit is good against that sort of siege units. Correct me if I'm wrong. As some units use these categories, we have to unify. The worst is that some units are grouped under this category but some units aren't because their categories suggest the main one. And you will see heavy infantry, light infantry etc. They are in-game definitions, which is essential to every game. A category would do the best for them. The reason why we don't exclude it even if we have categories like "rifleman", "pikeman", "swordsman" is that new players don't even know they belong to "light units" or "heavy units". Some players might even misunderstand these two terms. I see some commentators mixed up with those two, claiming longbowman and musketeer is a "heavy unit", while pikeman is a "light unit". (You see it depends on their HP and usefulness) It will be better if we can have some units under this categorization.

For the categories with precise description of the unit, you may want to add more, but here are the ones which I found common in some units.