Talk:Arambai/@comment-44010056-20191003162534

They are a bit UNBALANCED, in my humble opionion... Oh, well, so that is life, and it is not balanced, someone might say.

I d like to share my view on the new Asian civs. Oh, damn, I have the feeling that most of the new Asian civs are NOT balanced and seem very weird, for ex. MALAY got such a techtree that just by the look if it I m thinking > > > NO WAY I select those guys...Khmers seem the best for longer games or for 4v4 Nomad ... Burmese are OK but a bit UNFAIR in terms of the unique unit, too OP I guess, not that Conquistadors seem fair to me... But seriously, the Asian new civs are STRANGE! The Vietnamese seem too one-sided... The Malay are good for rushes in age II or III ofc but still seem bad to me... I expected more balanced and less one-sided gameplay in the long run from those civ. Same was with Aztec -who rely in ost games on only infantry and onagers, ... How do you see the new Asian civs? Maybe it is just me... Im kind of conservative. I did not like the fact that any civ would be playable without level 2 blacksmith techs. Ofc they wanted to bring balance with this idea but ... Im in AoE II since the year 2000! LOL ! Getting old I guess...