User blog comment:X~Calibur95/Balochistan's Block Duration/@comment-5157002-20170920184451/@comment-4041822-20171010055055

That's quite unfortunate. Had the block duration on 24.13.160.179 been the same as the block duration on Balochistan, this case wouldn't have happened. I'll let this and the one before pass by for now. I don't want to belabor this further, but if Balochistan were to do something like this again, we may need to reconsider the block duration. An alternative idea is to do a range block to prevent this from happening, because I'm not interested in extending the current block duration. I hope this settles everything.