Talk:Saracens/@comment-2602:306:CCB2:1FE0:8509:2D11:410A:66AA-20170722235103/@comment-2602:306:CCB2:1FE0:316C:6538:320D:DE39-20170802192931

Okay, thats a pretty convincing guess, even though I don't know much about arab history.

The reason why I asked this question of mine is because of the point of this saracen attack bonus against buildings. Specifically, the cavalry archer +3 or +4 attack bonus against buildings and foot archer +1 team bonus against buildings. I suppose its useful against civilizations that have the architecture tech upgrade from their university, however, I honestly think it would be much better if the saracens rather receive that attack bonus as just an attack booster or attack points in general aganst all units and things instead of buildings only. Infact, I really would have thought that this saracen attack bonus against buildings would actually go to the huns, since it would be definitely WAY more fitting for the huns to have then the saracens.

And besides, that Saracen team bonus is devastatingly useless in many cases. It would have been much better if the saracen team bonus makes all units within the archery range buildiing to recieve +3 or +4 attack bonus against buildings.