Talk:Sioux/@comment-26459635-20170501203107/@comment-26459635-20171024123022

the fact that the aztec empire fell in 1 battle shows that, despite the size of their empire, they only had 1 city worth protecting. also, the individual maya states all fell pretty easily. none of this applies to the inca, which to me proves they were better. also, the spaniards coult have made use of the extensive inca road system to get to those hard to reach places.

if that "so" relates to my comment about the campaigns, i said that to illustrate why i don't want a campaign about the inca, as they'd probably butcher it like they did with those other things