User talk:Narve


 * Archive 1
 * Archive 2
 * Archive 3
 * Archive 4
 * Archive 5
 * Archive 6

Canoes and catamaran
They are three times less efficient at fishing/whaling than fishing boats, caravels, etc. I couldn't figure out how to link to the fishing ship category. Caravels, fishing boats, galleys, etc all share the same 0.67/0.5 gather rates. TheRealMictlantecuhtli (talk) 19:45, February 21, 2019 (UTC)


 * Maybe we could just write that? "They are less efficient than other fishing ships, like Fishing Boats and Caravels"? Incidentally, if you want to link to categories, it's like this: Category:Fishing ships - put a colon in front of the link.Narve (talk) 18:06, February 22, 2019 (UTC)

Nonsense comments
https://ageofempires.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:B011:800C:3578:D9C5:440C:B0B7:A106 Can you "take care of" this user?


 * Try User:MasterBroccoli too. TheRealMictlantecuhtli (talk) 15:02, March 8, 2019 (UTC)


 * I would have done something if I'd seen it sooner, but thankfully, MasterBroccoli handled it.Narve (talk) 09:54, March 9, 2019 (UTC)

Hey I noticed you did some cleaning up on the wars of liberty page. Could you explain the though process behind it and why we're sticking to old html coding? OuroDragon (talk) 23:47, March 11, 2019 (UTC)


 * The wiki markup has been used here since the beginning of the wiki. I don't think we should abandon it for a single page - all pages should follow the same formatting.Narve (talk) 11:20, March 13, 2019 (UTC)

Native and Arsenal technology pages
Who gave consensus to Nikitazero to create all the pages of the Native American technology pages? Examples like Yoga, Punjabi New Year , Nootka Potlatch ? And what about the Church improvement pages? I personally disagree with the creation of miniscule technology pages, the original form of them was better, because those articles don´t have any useful information aside that they can be explained in their origin page, for example "Thin Red Line " or   "Wild Geese ", are fine if they are left in the church page, what is your take? 18:32, March 23, 2019 (UTC)


 * No one gave him permission - I asked him to seek consensus first, but he ignored it. He later created a blog post about it, but didn't receive any replies. I agree that they are unnecesary, but if you want them to be returned to redirects, you should start a discussion about it - either in Nikitazero's blog post, or create one of your own, or go to the forum.Narve (talk) 19:10, March 23, 2019 (UTC)

My biggest complaint is he is in such a rush he is making numerous little mistakes. Good on him for being enthusiastic, but I question if he wants to improve the wiki or just wants mod power since he did threaten me with a ban if he was a mod. The constant need for praise is a little off putting too, like he can't handle criticism. Like I was years ago, as the admin. I felt I owned the wiki, instead of it being for everyone. It is why a lot of the articles read like a love letter to Spain. TheRealMictlantecuhtli (talk) 20:03, March 23, 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes, I understand that I acted on my own, but I hate it if I can't act freely and my efforts were restricted, even if that's for the best. I also didn't like if there's someone who didn't appreciate my efforts and seeking to revert them. Well, if they're going to be reverted back to redirects, undoing all the trouble I went to make those pages, I don't mind, but from that point onward I'll cease contributing to the AoE Wiki and returns to the wikis I've been handling for (Mental Omega APYR, Rise of the Reds, etc.), since that clearly shows my efforts went unappreciated. Speaking of which, my justification for adding native, Church/Mosque, and Arsenal tech pages are quite simple: "if other techs in other AoE3 games have their own pages, why shouldn't native, Church/Mosque, and Arsenal techs have their own pages too?" Nikitazero (talk) 12:43, March 24, 2019 (UTC)