Talk:Sioux/@comment-26459635-20170501203107/@comment-27726014-20171023134936

The Inca are not that old. As a tribe they are very old but the empire existed for only around 200 years and was much smaller during most of it's existence. They couldn't have bred completely new crops in that amount of time.

The Aztecs didn't have much gold. Yucatan doesn't contain much precious metal at all which was sort of disappointing for the Spanish. Almost all the wealth came from the Inca territory. Also the fact that their land provided resources doesn't matter. What matters is how much resistence they gave and how much of a legacy they left behind. The Iroqoius had a huge cultural legacy because of their influence in forming the United States and their role as a buffer state between the British and French.

Though I agree the Inca would have been a perhaps better pick than the Aztecs. Warshiefs really should have had 3 campaigns and the only major native conflict going on in the time between Morgan and John is the Inca. However the conflict itself is pretty much the same as the Sioux so that's gonna be hard. A possiblitiy is to perhaps involve pirates again as privaterring was very common. Maybe make a more depressing story with the protagonist failing to get rich and being hated by both the natives and the settlers so they return to the colonies.